0
0
By Abayomi’s Odunowo.
Good morning, sir. I wish to address an issue that has been raising significant concern within our nation’s discourse— the recurring emphasis on the contribution of each zone in terms of Value Added Tax (VAT). While on the surface this may appear to be a straightforward statistical inquiry into regional economic performance, I argue that it is a dangerously divisive position to adopt at this critical juncture in our country’s development. The statistics surrounding VAT contributions, while informative, can inadvertently widen the chasm between Nigeria’s diverse regions rather than fostering unity. The very purpose of analyzing such data must be scrutinized, lest we find ourselves further entrenched in regional tensions.
The matter of regional contribution to VAT is particularly worrisome given Nigeria’s complex socio-economic landscape. Historically, our nation has witnessed a cycle of resource exploitation and contribution that has often culminated in regional resentment and discord. Take, for example, the Northern region’s groundnut pyramid, which once fueled the economy, or the wealth derived from crude oil in the South-South, which continues to serve as the backbone of our national revenue. We cannot ignore the agricultural bounty of the South-West, with its cocoa and rubber production that sustained both local and national economies for generations. Each region has significantly contributed to our collective wealth in various ways, and to dissect this into a mere statistical competition is not only reductive but also perilously divisive.
By emphasizing and scrutinizing VAT revenues by region, we risk igniting old grievances among different groups and invoking damaging stereotypes. This practice perpetuates a mindset of ‘us versus them’, where one region is pitted against another in a battle of economic superiority. Consider how regional cooperation has historically been strained when economic contributions are highlighted in isolation. Rather than promoting healthy discussion on the equitable distribution of resources and wealth generated within our borders, we risk setting a precedent that encourages blame and discord.
Moreover, these statistics often fail to take into account the nuances of each region’s economic realities, such as the varying levels of infrastructural development, access to markets, and investment opportunities. A simplistic comparison can overlook the fact that poorer regions may not generate as much VAT simply because they lack the economic framework to do so, rather than a lack of contribution to the national economy. The ramifications of viewing these contributions through a narrow, competitive lens can lead to feelings of inferiority and neglect among regions already wrestling with economic disadvantages.
Instead of focusing on the intricacies of regional contributions through the VAT lens, I believe we should advocate for a more collaborative and holistic approach to our national economic discussions. We should advocate for dialogues that celebrate interdependence and mutual support. Let us not forget that throughout our history, different regions have relied on one another to thrive. A Northern region that once propelled the economy through agriculture, a Southern region that continues to benefit from oil, and a Western region that has historically been rich in commerce all play crucial roles in our shared prosperity.
The emphasis should shift from divisive statistics to cooperative economic strategies that recognize the interconnectedness of our regions. For instance, initiatives aimed at improving infrastructural development across all states could be prioritized, leveling the playing field for economic growth and allowing each region to maximize its unique contributions. Moreover, a transparent allocation of resources that acknowledges past contributions while investing equally in future development can foster goodwill and reduce rancor among the regions.
While statistics such as regional VAT contributions may initially seem harmless or even beneficial, carefully navigating their presentation and the discussions that stem from them is vital. We must strive to build bridges rather than walls among our diverse regions. Only then can we ensure that Nigeria grows stronger together—holistically, equitably, and inclusively. Let us be cautious of the analysis we promote, for in a nation with as many layers as ours, the right dialogue is essential for cultivating unity and shared growth.
Otunba Abdulfalil Abayomi Odunowo
National Chairman AATSG
Mobile: +2349053535322
AATSG Media.
URL: www.AATSG.org.ng
WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VadcNX21NCrRShw4S33A
AATSG OFFICIAL
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.slim.aatsg
AATSGiD
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.myid.aatsgid.
SB E-news
SB events magazine
Efficiency magazine
www.sbenews.com.ng
www.efficiency.com.ng
ceo_sbenews@efficiency.com.ng
sbeventnews@gmail.com
About the Author
