0
0
Public trust forms the bedrock of effective governance. When allegations surface involving public officials, funds, or institutions, they demand serious, transparent, and institutional responses not dismissal or sensationalism. The ongoing controversy over the alleged Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), its purported links to the Office of the Chief of Staff, and bribery claims by Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi requires precisely this approach.
Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s call for accountability merits attention, as opposition scrutiny strengthens democracy. Yet accountability must rest on evidence, not accusation. Allegation is not guilt; suspicion is not conviction. The presumption of innocence, enshrined in Section 36(5) of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution, safeguards justice for all citizens, officials, and accusers alike. Eroding it invites mob justice, propaganda, and selective persecution.
Nigeria’s history underscores why due process matters. Successive administrations have faced budget controversies, including alleged padding and unauthorized insertions. In 2000, President Olusegun Obasanjo rejected an Appropriation Bill, accusing the National Assembly of inflating it by about N2 billion. Similar disputes arose in 2011 under President Goodluck Jonathan. During the Buhari era, then-House Appropriations Chairman Abdulmumin Jibrin accused Speaker Yakubu Dogara and others of padding the 2016 budget by over N40 billion; later years saw executive complaints of insertions totaling tens to hundreds of billions.
These cases along with the Pius Okigbo panel’s findings on unaccounted oil revenues in earlier eras and the Dasukigate arms procurement scandal reveal a pattern: public outrage highlights problems, but independent audits, legislative probes, anti-corruption investigations (by EFCC/ICPC), documentary evidence, and judicial processes establish facts and assign culpability. Rushing to judgment has often muddied truth and undermined institutions.
An independent investigation into the PFIPC is essential. It must examine: the council’s origins and promoters; any public engagements or visibility granted; correspondence received by institutions; formal approvals (or lack thereof); budget entries in the 2026 Appropriation Act; any financial requests, payments, or misrepresentations; and interactions involving the Presidency, Budget Office, MDAs, and National Assembly.
The Presidency’s disclaimer that PFIPC is unrecognized and no appointments were made under the Tinubu administration is a key fact. Yet reports of the name’s appearance in budget documents and alleged engagements raise legitimate questions. Both can coexist: unauthorized actors may have exploited the name, warranting scrutiny of verification failures across institutions, without presuming guilt at the top.
Separate the issues clearly. The Chief of Staff’s office does not create agencies, appropriate funds, or enact budgets. Nigeria’s process involves the Executive, Budget Office, MDAs, and National Assembly. Any irregularities demand comprehensive review, not selective targeting.
This is no defense of wrongdoing it is a defense of procedure. If Rt. Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila or others are exonerated, a credible probe clears their names and rebuilds trust. If exploitation, bribery, or systemic lapses occurred, perpetrators must face lawful consequences, regardless of status. As in past scandals, evidence not emotion must prevail.
Atiku Abubakar rightly seeks transparency, but framing demands as pre-verdict condemnations risks undermining the rule of law he champions. Conversely, government silence or vagueness fuels suspicion. Full disclosure from relevant bodies Presidency, Budget Office, National Assembly committees is the mature response Nigerians deserve.
Nigeria must reject two extremes: shielding officials from scrutiny due to position, or destroying reputations via unproven claims for political gain. History shows both paths erode governance. The PFIPC matter tests institutional maturity. Handle it through independent inquiry, full document review, audits, and evidence-based outcomes.
Accountability and fairness are not opposites they are inseparable. Let evidence guide us. Allegation is not guilt. Justice requires proof.
Signed,
Otunba (Dr.) Abdulfalil Abayomi Odunowo
National President, SpeakUp Collective Nigeria.
SB E-news.
About the Author
