0
0
There are moments in the history of a people when leadership does not just manage government but quietly resets the economic destiny of the state. I believe the eight years of His Excellency, Senator Otunba Gbenga Daniel, must be remembered in Ogun State history as one of those moments, especially in agriculture and in the forward looking infrastructure thinking that grew out of that agricultural rebirth.
I say this from what I personally saw across the state during those years. I moved through communities where farming was life, not theory. I spoke with farmers who measured government impact not by press statements but by whether their soil was productive, whether markets existed, and whether their children could see a future in agriculture. During those years, something changed. Agriculture stopped looking like the past and started looking like the future again.
One of the most defining things I witnessed was the deliberate return to the farm settlement philosophy first laid down by the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo. For many years those settlements had become shadows of what they once represented. Under OGD, there was a conscious effort to bring that structure back to life, not as nostalgia, but as economic strategy. Old settlements received renewed attention and new ones came into existence across agricultural corridors of the state. What struck many of us watching closely was that this was not politics of slogans. Land was being opened. Youth were being engaged. Farming communities were being reorganised around productivity again.
At the same time, the administration did not stop at land structure alone. There was a strong push into commercial agriculture. Ofada rice was not treated only as heritage food but as economic commodity. Cassava expansion was tied to industrial potential. Cotton and sugar development reflected deeper thinking around agro processing and industrial linkage. Livestock support widened the agricultural base. To me, it was clear that this was agriculture being treated as serious economic policy, not seasonal empowerment activity.
Mechanisation also began to change the psychology of farming. Tractor access and mechanisation support started reducing the burden of manual farming. There was growing conversation around farming as business, not survival labour. I remember clearly how this began to influence how younger people viewed agriculture. It started to look less like punishment and more like opportunity.
What many people may not immediately connect, but which I saw clearly as events unfolded, was how this agricultural revival naturally gave birth to bigger economic thinking. Once production increases, the next question becomes where will the produce go. Once farmers begin to scale, the next question becomes how fast goods can reach markets beyond local boundaries.
It is inside that economic reality that the agro cargo airport vision must be understood. From what I saw and followed over the years, that airport idea was never just an aviation project. It was an economic extension of a state that was already rebuilding its agricultural strength. The thinking was forward looking. If Ogun State was going to feed major markets and eventually export agro products, then logistics infrastructure had to be part of the long term plan.
During the Daniel years, the cargo airport concept was already on the table as part of broader economic expansion thinking tied to trade, export, and industrial growth. What is important historically is that it did not remain an idea alone. Processes were initiated. Approvals were pursued. Regulatory pathways were followed. Planning frameworks and blueprints were developed. Location thinking was deliberate, taking into account economic corridors, industrial proximity, and accessibility to major trade routes.
From my perspective watching governance during that period, it was clear the cargo airport vision was inspired by the renewed economic activities already happening in agriculture and industry. It was the natural infrastructure response to a state that was preparing itself for bigger economic participation beyond local markets.
What later developments only confirmed was that the thinking was ahead of its time. The agro cargo airport would later be tied to agro processing zones, export logistics systems, and broader economic hub thinking. But for those of us who watched the earlier years closely, the roots of that vision were already visible when agriculture itself was being repositioned as the backbone of Ogun State’s economic future.
The deeper truth, from what I witnessed, is that the cargo airport vision represented an understanding that agriculture is not complete without logistics. Production alone does not create prosperity. Production connected to fast movement, export channels, and global market access is what creates long term economic strength. That was the direction the state was being quietly positioned toward.
History is often written around who finished projects, but true historical record also remembers who first saw the future, who laid foundations, who secured pathways, and who created the economic logic that made later execution possible. In the case of Ogun State’s agro cargo aviation vision, the agricultural revival of the Daniel years created the economic justification, the planning momentum, and the policy confidence that made such a project inevitable.
From what I saw across those eight years, the agro cargo airport was never about aircraft alone. It was about farmers having global market access. It was about ensuring that increased agricultural production would not be trapped within local distribution limitations. It was about positioning Ogun State as a bridge between production, industry, and international trade.
Looking back now, I am convinced that those years represented more than governance. They represented economic direction setting. The soil was brought back to the centre of development thinking, and from that soil came the vision of infrastructure that could carry Ogun State’s agricultural strength to the world.
That, to me, is not political argument. It is lived observation. It is history as it unfolded before many of us who watched the transformation from the ground up.
Kehinde Ojo.
SB E-news.
About the Author
