0
0
There is a lie that has been told so many times in this country that it has calcified into mythology. Repeated at rallies, thundered from pulpits, inscribed on protest placards, and wept over at anniversary gatherings with candles and camera crews, it has become the emotional infrastructure of a political grievance so entrenched that to question it is to risk being denounced as a saboteur of Yoruba memory.
The lie is this: that the North killed June 12.
It did not. The North carried June 12 on its back, drove through the night to deliver it, wept when it was done, and has received neither credit nor gratitude in return.
THE NIGHT THE NORTH MADE JUNE 12 POSSIBLE
At the Social Democratic Party presidential primaries held in Jos in 1993, Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola did not walk into that convention hall as the inevitable candidate. Two northern sons of the SDP stood between him and the flag. Baba Gana Kingibe of Borno and Atiku Abubakar of Adamawa between them commanded five thousand, three hundred and twenty-one votes. Abiola held three thousand, six hundred and seventeen.
Had those two northern gentlemen merged their forces, as political logic and self-interest demanded, the Yoruba billionaire from Abeokuta would have been sent home. There would have been no SDP candidacy. No general election. No June 12 mandate. No martyrdom. No legend. Nothing.
Let the record be stated with absolute precision. Baba Gana Kingibe did not step down at Jos. He stayed in the race. The rerun was between Abiola and Kingibe, and in that rerun Abiola won.
But here is what the commemorations never tell you. Atiku had a choice. He could have remained in the rerun. More consequentially, he could have withdrawn and directed his delegates behind Kingibe, his fellow northerner and kinsman, the man whose victory would have kept the presidency firmly in northern hands. That was what self-interest and regional solidarity both demanded.
Instead, on the instruction of Shehu Yar’Adua at three in the morning, Atiku withdrew and cleared the path for a Yoruba man. He chose a southern candidate over a northern kinsman. He surrendered his delegates to a cause that was not his region’s, not his tribe’s, and not his personal gain. He made that choice alone, at the hour when it cost the most.
That is not political calculation. That is an act of national conscience that the South West has spent thirty years forgetting.
Shehu Musa Yar’Adua drove through the darkness of the Kaduna to Jos road and arrived at three in the morning. He found Atiku Abubakar and, in Fulfulde, the language of his bloodline, delivered one sentence.
“Turaki. Step down for MKO Abiola.”
Atiku wept. And then he obeyed. Abiola crossed the room, embraced the man who had just handed him Nigeria, and spoke words that were not a transaction but a covenant.
“This Nigeria, we will run it together.
Note this also: Abiola did not send an aide. He sent Yar’Adua, the one man Atiku could not refuse, through the Kaduna night. Because you do not dispatch a political titan at three in the morning to persuade a man whose votes do not matter. The urgency of that midnight mission was itself the confession of how decisive Atiku’s delegates were. The drive through the darkness is the evidence.
And yet, in thirty years of June 12 commemoration, in annual lectures and state holidays and monument unveilings, this is the passage of the story that Nigeria’s political class has chosen to footnote into near-invisibility. The northern sacrifice that made the southern mandate possible has been quietly excised from the official memory. What remains is the annulment. What is omitted is the three o’clock drive.
THE PRESIDENCY THE SOUTH WEST DID NOT BUILD ALONE
If Atiku’s sacrifice delivered June 12 to Abiola, it was that same Atiku who delivered the Nigerian presidency to another Yoruba son less than six years later. When Olusegun Obasanjo emerged from Abacha’s prison in 1998, he was a symbol but not yet a political machine. His path to Aso Rock required a northern bridge capable of mass mobilisation across nineteen states. Atiku Abubakar became that bridge.
He did this while simultaneously contesting the Adamawa governorship. He placed Obasanjo’s presidential project above his own campaign, mobilised the PDP governors of the North into alignment, deployed his financial and human networks across primary and general election alike, and in 2003 declined to challenge his principal even as his own popularity had grown so formidable that it made Obasanjo’s inner circle visibly uneasy.
Obasanjo served eight years. His presidency grew Nigeria’s GDP from approximately fifty-eight billion dollars to two hundred and seventy billion dollars. It produced Paris Club debt relief, the GSM revolution, the EFCC, and Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. Every benefit the South West extracted from those eight years carries, somewhere in its foundation, the fingerprints of Atiku Abubakar. To celebrate that presidency without acknowledging Atiku’s role in making it possible is not history. It is ingratitude.
As for the rupture between the two men — many ignoramuses have cited it to smear Atiku. What broke their relationship was not treachery, not rivalry, not the envy of a subordinate who had outgrown his station. What broke it was Olusegun Obasanjo’s attempt to procure a third term through legislative manipulation, to extend beyond the two terms that the 1999 constitution permitted him. Atiku refused. Publicly. At personal cost. At the cost of the relationship he had invested more than any other man to build.
He stood for the constitution against his own principal, at the hour when standing for it was most expensive. The man who broke with Obasanjo over the third term bid was not a disloyal deputy. He was a democrat, a committed and unwavering one, who paid a price for that stand and took it anyway. Nigeria owes him a debt not merely for what he built. It owes him a debt for what he refused to destroy.
THE MATTER OF BLOOD, OF FIRST WIFE, OF HOME
Atiku Abubakar, the Waziri Adamawa, the Fulani son of the North-East, chose a Yoruba woman as his first wife. Not as a political associate. Not as a coalition partner. As the senior woman of his household. As the mother of his children.
Hajiya Titilayo Abubakar is Yoruba. She has carried the Abubakar name for decades, sat at the centre of that household, and raised children who are simultaneously Fulani and Yoruba, simultaneously of the North-East and the South-West, simultaneously the two zones that Nigerian political rhetoric most persistently frames as irreconcilable. Think carefully about what this means. A man who takes a Yoruba woman as his first wife has not made a political gesture. He has made a life decision.
He has said, without a microphone or a crowd, that Yoruba blood is not foreign to him, not other, not a curiosity or a diplomatic calculation. It is the blood of his household and of his children. In Yoruba tradition, a man who marries your daughter is not an ally. He is family. His claim upon your house is generational, sealed not with signatures but with bloodlines. Atiku Abubakar married into the Yoruba nation at the most intimate level a man can manage. That is not a talking point rehearsed for a campaign rally. That is a bloodline. And in Yoruba culture, perhaps more than anywhere else in this republic, family is not abandoned at the ballot box.
THE DEBT, THE ARITHMETIC, AND THE 2027 VERDICT
Twenty-seven years of the Fourth Republic. Six geopolitical zones. The South West has held the presidency for twelve of those years ,eight under Obasanjo, four now under Tinubu. The North-East, Atiku’s zone, has held it for zero years. Not a transitional arrangement. Not a deputy’s inherited tenure. Not a caretaker’s brief interlude. Zero years of a full presidential mandate across the entire lifespan of this Fourth Republic.
Factor in the deficit that Jonathan’s full 2011 mandate created by truncating the northern rotational sequence that Yar’Adua’s death had already disrupted. That disruption produced a generational imbalance in democratic equity that has never been honestly accounted for in public discourse. Its weight falls heaviest on the zone that contributed most to southern democratic fortune and received the least in return. In 2027, supporting Atiku is the most direct and morally coherent correction of that imbalance available to the South West.
There are those who will say: but Tinubu is Yoruba. Vote your own. Very well. But Yoruba blood in Aso Rock is not a policy. It is not a rebate on fuel. It is not a stable exchange rate. It is not food on the table of a Lagos market woman whose purchasing power has been consumed by the most savage naira depreciation in Nigeria’s recorded history. It is not the university fees of an Ibadan academic whose salary has been rendered meaningless by inflation.
Pride of tribe is a luxury most readily available to those who are not simultaneously hungry, and the South West has been hungry long enough to know the difference between a symbol and a solution.
Atiku Abubakar offers something more durable than ethnic solidarity. He offers a privatisation and liberalisation agenda that serves Lagos and the South West’s commercial interests more directly than any other zone in Nigeria. He offers a documented thirty-year record of Pan-Nigerian sacrifice that is not rhetorical but demonstrated, not manufactured but lived. He offers the dominant northern political structure ,five states in the North-East, three in the North-West — that makes a winning national coalition arithmetically possible in a way that no regional candidate can replicate.
He offers the American University of Nigeria, built from his personal resources before he ever sat in Aso Rock, as evidence that his investment in human capital is not a campaign promise but a standing institution. And he offers a Yoruba first wife, Yoruba children, and Yoruba grandchildren. His home is already a united Nigeria. His household settled the question of national unity decades before it became a campaign slogan.
In 2027, the South West has the opportunity to settle a debt outstanding since three o’clock in the morning in Jos in 1993. Not out of sentiment. Not out of charity. But out of the cold, calculated recognition that political debts in functioning democracies are settled, that alliances are built on reciprocity, and that a people who benefit repeatedly from a man’s sacrifice and refuse to stand with him at his hour of need are not a people with political wisdom.
They are a people with political ingratitude. And ingratitude always returns to punish those who practise it.
Atiku sacrificed for Abiola. Atiku anchored Obasanjo. Atiku refused to let the constitution be dismantled. Atiku married into the Yoruba family.
The South West must not be the zone that history records as the one that forgot who showed up at three o’clock in the morning.
Because Nigeria does not forget. And history most certainly does not forgive.
Aare Amerijoye Dotb,
Director General,
The Narrative Force,
thenarrativeforce.org
15 May 2026.
SB E-news.
Related posts:
THE FALL OF PRESIDENT ASSAD: A TESTAMENT TO PEOPLE POWER.www.sbenews.com.ng www.efficiency.com.ng
ICPC KICKS OFF PHASE 7 OF THE CONSTITUENCY AND EXECUTIVE PROJECT TRACKING EXERCISE www.sbenews.com.n...
Sanwo-Olu Not Asked To Resign – Disregard Sahara Reporters’ Falsehood www.sbenews.com.ng www.efficie...
About the Author
